頁:
[1]
2
韓國海軍接收第3艘“宙斯盾”導彈驅逐艦
本帖最後由 MightyDragon 於 2012-9-24 07:58 AM 編輯「西崖柳成龍」號驅逐艦正式在韓國海軍海軍服役！這第三艘神盾戰鬥系統為Baseline 7 Phase 1版本，整合了AN/SPY-1D雷達的強大能力，「西崖柳成龍」將會給韓國人更大的底氣去對抗日本「自衛隊」—雖然在艦艇的數目、噸位和種類上韓國海軍依然是處於劣勢！但這達6200噸級的「世宗大王」依然是一艘卓越的驅逐艦，單單是其中採用的四台LM-2500-30燃氣渦輪所組成「燃燃聯合式」的複雜動力系統，就已將解放軍的最新型052D比下去，值得中國船廠去借鏡和參考參考...
Aug. 30, 2012 - 10:58AM | Source: DefenceNews By JUNG SUNG-KI
SEOUL — South Korea’s Navy took over its third Aegis-equipped destroyer from the Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) on Aug. 30.
Built in September 2009, the KDX-III 7,600-ton Sejong the Great-class ship has undergone two years of sea trials and other operational tests, Navy and DAPA officials said.
The third ship was named after Ryu Seong-ryong, a prime minister of the Joseon Kingdom of Korea.
“The Ryu Seong-ryong ship will play a key role in leading the South Korean Navy’s mobile fleet,” the DAPA said in a news release.
The South Korean Navy created its strategic mobile fleet in 2010 in an effort to develop its blue-water capabilities beyond coastal defense against North Korea. The fleet is backed by 4,500-ton KDX-II destroyers, 1,800-ton attack submarines, P3-C maritime patrol aircraft and others.
The KDX-III destroyer can carry two midsized helicopters and sail at a top speed of 30 knots within a range of 1,000 kilometers. The ship’s SPY-1D radar can simultaneously track some 1,000 aircraft within a 500-kilomter radius, according to the Navy. The 166-meter-long, 21-meter-wide vessel carries about 120 missiles and torpedoes in its Mk 41 vertical launch system and domestically-built Korea Vertical Launch System.
“The Ryu Seong-ryong will be fully operational with the Navy in mid-2013 after nine months of final operational tests, including Aegis combat system ship qualification trials with allied nations,” a Navy spokesman said.
With three Aegis destroyers in service, the South Korean Navy has gained a solid edge over North Korea in terms of naval combat capability, he added. North Korea’s Navy is believed to have about 400 warships, but most of them are small and old.
The South Korean Navy is pushing ahead with introducing more advanced ships to develop its ocean-going force.
In a report to President Lee Myung-bak on Aug. 29, the Ministry of National Defense said it would launch one more 14,000-ton Dokdo-class landing platform helicopter by 2016. The 199-meter-long, 31-meter-wide vessel is the largest helicopter transporter in Asia, bigger than the Osumi-class landing ships (8,900 tons) of the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force.
The vessel can serve as a light aircraft carrier to orchestrate the Navy’s mobile fleet as well as conduct international peacekeeping operations and disaster relief.
The ministry also unveiled a plan to build six 5,600-ton “mini-Aegis destroyers” between 2019 and 2016....<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div><div></div> 的確是東亞最強的宙斯盾驅逐艦 愛岩 052D真的被比下去 但對於韓國來說是不是有點浪費? 宙斯盾驅逐艦~~
應該有反彈道飛彈的能力吧??
這應該也是韓國需要的~{:36:} 韓國這是要發展遠洋海軍嗎？對這個四個方向都被封鎖的內海國家，這麼大的神盾艦純粹就是浪費！如果要對抗小日本的話，直接上導彈快艇就完全夠用了，效費比還高得多！ 這種等級的船艦...台灣不知道要多久才能擁有~
真是令人羨慕!<br><br><br><br><br><div></div> 感覺是很威啦!!韓國買來是為了恫嚇,還是真的想發展遠洋艦隊,
台灣真的很可憐...明明都是民國派,現在遭遇卻兩極化... AW050263AW 發表於 2012-9-24 01:59 PM static/image/common/back.gif
宙斯盾驅逐艦~~
應該有反彈道飛彈的能力吧??
這應該也是韓國需要的~
美國人沒給標准3估計也不會給先進度不如日本的這句來自大陸海軍少將尹卓。賣給韓國的基線7.1“宙斯盾”系統肯定刪除了相關作戰控制系統。 韓國造艦應該不會跟日本與中國比拼 也許是造了一 二艘後 開始對外銷售 看了看就制造了一個外殼上面的東西都進口自歐美 要想出口必須擁有自己的東西。<br><br><br><br><br><div></div> yastern 發表於 2012-9-24 09:39 PM static/image/common/back.gif
韓國造艦應該不會跟日本與中國比拼 也許是造了一 二艘後 開始對外銷售
我就沒發現他獨立自主研制出來一款大型水面艦艇，都是購買自歐美韓國人想做生意它哪來的砝碼？難道買歐美的動力 雷達 導彈 造個殼子賣給第三國嗎？誰不想撈錢不過它還沒這個能力資本。日本還較為獨立研制最新一行的秋月級驅逐艦至少雷達 電子系統 以及部分導彈是國產的。日本秋月級安裝了美國的MK41動力來自英國的RR防空導彈是美國的，指揮系統和雷達電子系統 反潛是自己的比韓國有實力的多。大陸完全自力更生~！...<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容，請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div> AN/SPY-1D雷達的強大能力不知道要多大的船艦才可以裝的下...
@真是令人羨慕! 看起來還行，但對付北韓好像不需要這樣的軍艦吧 打了就知道深淺了
講那麼多數據有什麼屁用阿
宙斯盾會比宇宙頓還要來的利害嗎 噸位好像比日本的小耶 這樣戰利會比較強嗎??? 但韓國軍事力量也不會太差拉<br><br><br><br><br><div></div>
頁:
[1]
2