查看完整版本: 中國:加入「私人保安」的龍
頁: [1]

MightyDragon 發表於 2012-12-15 03:43 PM

中國:加入「私人保安」的龍


作為愛好和平的國家,中國並不像某些國一樣可以肆無忌憚的將正規軍人派到海外,並要求當地政府給予這些大兵有法外之權力。由此在中國出現了一些民營的保安公司企業,像文中所提及的「山東華威保安集團」,其保安人員由前解放軍、武警所組成,在蘇丹、伊拉克等地執行保安工作,保護在當地工作的中國人的人身安全…



Source: Fedral Jundi
Original Tite: China: Enter The ‘Private Security’ Dragon
Posted by Matt in China, Industry Talk, Kidnap And Ransom

During the recent Sudan hostage crisis, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Sudanese troops who engaged in the rescue effort were joined by a dozen armed Chinese private security contractors. While that article and coverage of the issue in the Chinese media didn’t identify where the contractors came from, there’s a strong likelihood they were drawn from the same pool of former security forces personnel that Shandong Huawei recruits from and perhaps even came from the company. Chinese sources say it was the Sudanese military that told news outlets armed Chinese contractors were participating, so it appears that Beijing wants to keep its use of private security contractors out of the public eye.

Lately I have noticed an upward trend in reporting about China and it’s private security. These three articles below help to paint that picture of what I am talking about. We have a situation where China has interests all over the world, their people are getting killed and kidnapped all over the world in higher numbers, and security situations are changing for the worse in some of these places they have set up shop in.

Not only that, but now Chinese businesses are demanding more protection and they have the money to buy it. Especially if Chinese PSC’s charge less than western companies.

This first article below talks about the company Shandong Huawei Security Group. I have never heard of them before, and I could not find a link to their website. Although I doubt I would put a link up to their site for fear of getting some virus or whatever. lol Either way, Shandong Huawei is supposed to be one of their top PSC’s.

The article also described an interesting situation going on in Iraq. As the security situation degrades and there is now a lack of western forces to keep things in check, companies like Shandong Huawei are stepping in to fill that security vacuum in order to protect companies like the China National Petroleum Corporation. Oil is of national interest to China, as it is to many countries, and PSC’s are a part of their strategy to protect those national interests.

In the quote up top it mentioned Sudan and the involvement of security contractors in the rescue of kidnapped Chinese workers. There is oil in the Sudan and China definitely has interest there. And if PSC’s are actively involved in rescue operations like this, then it is not far fetched to imagine PSC’s entering other areas of security which would border more military-like operations. Will we see a company like Shandong Huawei evolve into more of a private military company?

The other thing mentioned in this article is the strategic implications of Chinese PSC’s. Here is the quote:

There are a number of strategic implications of this rise of armed private security providers by Chinese firms. For a start, if a project is in an area unstable enough to require armed private guards, there’s a significant probability of armed encounters between security providers and potentially hostile locals. Coupled with this is the fact that given their police and military backgrounds, the contractors are likely to look and comport themselves like soldiers, and would probably be armed with similar types of weapons. There’s real potential, then, for confusion on the ground in a place like Sudan when a private contractor who looks like a soldier engages rebels or others who then mistake him for an actual member of Chinese government forces. A local whose relative was shot near a Chinese drilling site by a security guard who looks like a soldier is likely to blame Beijing, which could spark additional violence against Chinese interests in the area.

Yep. And if the local insurgency/gang/criminal elements are not getting their cut, then expect these groups to attack these Chinese ventures.

The second article below is very interesting to me because it is written by Chinese journalists and actually discusses the lack of experience that Chinese PSC’s have compared to American PSC’s. That they should ‘study’ American PSC’s….or steal trade secrets about such things. lol Either way, I thought this was cool that the Chinese have recognized the west’s expertise in this area. Check it out.

Calls for security guards from China to accompany workers posted in dangerous areas overseas have increased since kidnappings in Sudan and Egypt underscored the danger workers face as Chinese companies expand globally.
The abductions highlight the urgency to ensure the security of Chinese workers overseas, said Han Fangming, deputy director of the foreign affairs committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference National Committee, on his micro blog.
Han said that there is a need to study how private security contractors in the United States, such as Academi, work and “when the time is right, the government might allow qualified companies” to establish such services…. Another factor to consider is how prepared the security services are to handle dangerous situations.
“I think security guards in China are far from the level of private security contractors like Academi in the US,” Fu said.

Yep. Private security contractors in the US, and our western partners, have all learned many hard lessons over ten years of warfare. If China plans on allowing PSC’s to do this kind of thing in war zones, then yes, they will be looking to all and any lessons learned in order to make that work. It is also a matter of Mimicry Strategy, and whatever works best, will be copied.

The final article discusses the enormity of the Chinese presence throughout the world. It also emphasizes the threat to these citizens and the upward trend of kidnappings. More kidnappings equals more ransoms. More ransoms paid equates to a creation of a kidnapping industry where individuals purposely target Chinese. That is the price China will pay if they plan on setting up shop in these dangerous parts of the world.

The dramatic rise in overseas travel and expatriate work by Chinese was punctuated by the recent kidnappings of Chinese workers in Sudan and Egypt. “Overseas Chinese protection” (haiwai gongmin baohu) has been a critical priority since deadly attacks killed 14 Chinese workers in Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2004. Between 2006 and 2010, 6,000 Chinese citizens were evacuated to China from upheavals in the Solomon Islands, East Timor, Lebanon, Tonga, Chad, Thailand, Haiti and Kyrgyzstan.
But a new urgency has arisen in the past year: in 2011, China evacuated 48,000 citizens from Egypt, Libya, and Japan; 13 Chinese merchant sailors were murdered on the Mekong River in northern Thailand in October 2011; and in late January 2012, some 50 Chinese workers were kidnapped in two incidents by Sudanese rebels in South Kordofan province and by Bedouin tribesmen in the north of Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula.
The worldwide presence of Chinese citizens – and the dependencies that generates – will only continue to grow: in 2012, more than 60 million Chinese people will travel abroad, a figure up sixfold from 2000, and likely to reach 100 million in 2020. More than five million Chinese nationals work abroad, a figure sure to increase significantly in the years ahead.

That is a lot of Chinese traveling and working throughout the world! As the word gets out amongst the thugs/terrorists/rebels of the world, we will continue to see this Chinese kidnap and ransom trend increase. That means more protection work, and more hostage rescue or negotiation work for this young Chinese PSC market. So yes, I would speculate that we are witnessing the rise of the Private Security Dragon and who knows where this will lead. -Matt...<div class='locked'><em>瀏覽完整內容,請先 <a href='member.php?mod=register'>註冊</a> 或 <a href='javascript:;' onclick="lsSubmit()">登入會員</a></em></div><div></div>

yastern 發表於 2012-12-15 05:52 PM

聽說中國軍方特種的退下來都很搶手 許多國際私人維安公司都高薪聘顧 不過一國派軍到另一國是國與國的問題 並非私人保安這樣簡單 不能混為一談 打煙霧彈

白人壓高 發表於 2012-12-15 10:04 PM

中國的特戰部隊訓練也很嚴格 土法煉鋼  可惜作戰經驗就真的少了許多 就算訓練在多 沒有經驗
真的打起來也是會緊張一下

3542 發表於 2012-12-15 10:46 PM

的確有需要做保安

原因是有些疆獨分子和其他恐怖組織有往來
其中一個還聲稱要攻擊海外華人

不過這不是以軍隊的名義,本因沒有政治的問題

我倒是期待有沒有機會拓展,成為黑水公司(但不要出事)

heyjude2010 發表於 2012-12-16 01:18 AM

中國的保安公司的雇員大部分在戰鬥技能方面都沒有什麼料的,他們是挑身高高的看起來好看得,主要業務是幫大明星推開記者和粉絲或是某些大型場合出來撐場面。<br><br><br><br><br><div></div>

AW050263AW 發表於 2012-12-16 01:24 AM

確實是中國軍方特種退伍軍人~
在民間保安方面特別強手~
但與保安歸保安~
軍隊歸軍隊不一樣吧??{:40:}

kc045432 發表於 2012-12-16 02:59 AM

heyjude2010 發表於 2012-12-16 01:18 AM static/image/common/back.gif
中國的保安公司的雇員大部分在戰鬥技能方面都沒有什麼料的,他們是挑身高高的看起來好看得,主要業務是幫大 ...

不過文章裡面提到伊拉克跟蘇丹哪就很難說了,當地的治安不是很穩定

sunlife123 發表於 2012-12-16 03:00 AM

白人壓高 發表於 2012-12-15 10:04 PM static/image/common/back.gif
中國的特戰部隊訓練也很嚴格 土法煉鋼  可惜作戰經驗就真的少了許多 就算訓練在多 沒有經驗
真的打起來也是 ...

中國軍隊的經驗少你還可以說 特種部隊一直都有實戰經驗的金三角打毒販 打東突 等等

lungchi 發表於 2013-1-8 12:57 AM

不過這一類的公司背後應改也都有官方的手伸進去吧.
畢竟有時候如果找正規的軍人去當保安.後面所以延伸的問題.
可能不是隨便幾句就可以說明的.就好像某公司的保安在伊拉克殺人了.
該國的官方就可以馬上說那是該公司的過人行為與本國無關.

g00125767 發表於 2013-1-8 12:48 PM

現代鏢局重出江湖
那能配槍嗎?還是雙手萬能
還是另一種型態的"公務員"像上次保護外交官
<br><br><br><br><br><div></div>

gordon0509 發表於 2013-1-16 11:51 AM

這因該是傳說中的中南海保鑣的延伸吧!
感覺中國的特種部隊退伍之後好像也非常的搶手啊!{:49:}
頁: [1]